Just Hair
👋 Home🗂️ Work💇🏾‍♀️ Just Hair

Just Hair

An AI hair-care assistant for women with textured hair: it explains your hair before it recommends anything, so years of trial and error become a routine you can trust.

Status
Concept, tested hi-fi prototype
Context
Solo project, ELVTR product design program
My role
Product and UX, end to end: research, prioritization, design and testing
Timeline
6 weeks
Segment
High-spending professionals with textured hair
Research
6 interviews, U.S. and Indonesia, ages 20s to 40s
Tested with
6 participants (mid-fi) and 7 unmoderated Maze testers
North star
Routine followed for 3+ weeks
Stack
Figma, Maze, Notion; LLM feasibility in Lovable
Result
I took Just Hair from six interviews to a tested hi-fi prototype in six weeks, solo. In an unmoderated Maze test, 85% completed the routine flow without help and 86% said the hair report was what they needed.
“It took me 10 years to find products that actually worked.” Research participant

1. Background

Just Hair is my concept project from the ELVTR product design program. I chose it because textured-hair care is a deep, global problem that the industry underserves, and because large language models can finally read a photo and explain what they see in plain language. I owned every stage, and tested the LLM connection for feasibility in Lovable.

2. Project overview

Vision. Help women with textured hair understand their own hair first, then care for it with confidence and spend less getting there.

The market. Black consumers spent $6.6 billion on beauty in 2021, yet are 1.6 times more likely than White consumers to be dissatisfied with hair care products, and only 13% say it’s easy to find products that meet their needs at mass retailers (McKinsey, 2022). In 2017 they accounted for $54 million of the $63 million spent on ethnic hair and beauty products (NielsenIQ, 2018). High spend, low satisfaction: the gap is guidance, not supply.

Problem statement. Most people with textured hair don’t fully understand their own hair, and often take a decade or more to learn it. They rely on reviews, influencers and costly trial and error, so the industry puts the burden of expertise on the customer.

3. Ideation overview

Scope. A solo project: I made the product calls and tested them with users.

  • 6 interviews over Zoom and phone: 2 with tightly textured hair, 3 medium textured, 1 straight, across the U.S. and Indonesia, ages 20s to 40s
  • Secondary research on the hair-care market and on what LLMs can reliably analyze
  • A competitive scan of curl quizzes and product lines participants already used (Prose, Cantu, Shea Moisture)
  • Affinity mapping into six themes, then problem statements, POVs and How Might We questions

Target customer. Three personas came out of the research:

PersonaWho she isKey goalKey pain
Jasmine26, London, marketing director who travelsA healthy routine and less money wasted on productsSpends too much on products that don’t work; hard to find stylists abroad
Sherelle40, Melbourne, mother of a 6-year-oldTeach her daughter to love and care for her hairHer daughter’s hair is different from hers; afraid of harmful products
Jeanette21, Miami, swimmer with an active lifeA routine that survives sweat and pool daysNo routine, so her hair usually ends up in a bun
Persona board: Jasmine, 26, London, marketing director
Jasmine, the target segment: high spend, little to show for it.
Persona board: Sherelle, 40, Melbourne, mother of a 6-year-old
Sherelle: a strong second segment, planned for v2 household profiles.
Persona board: Jeanette, 21, Miami, active swimmer
Jeanette: lifestyle drives her routine, which shaped the lifestyle questionnaire.

4. Customer segmentation

We prioritized high-spending professionals with textured hair, the Jasmine segment. Their spend is the business case: redirect it to the right products and the product earns trust and a path to revenue.

SegmentImpactUrgencySize of marketTotal
High-spending professionals with textured hair54413
Parents caring for a child’s textured hair44311
Active, lifestyle-driven young women3339

Scored 1–5, retrospectively from research findings.

Parents scored close behind and stay in the roadmap as household profiles; the same analysis and routines serve them once the core works for one person.

5. Customer pain point

We prioritized not understanding my own hair, the root cause behind years of trial and error.

Pain pointImpactUrgencySizeTotal
Not understanding my own hair, so years of trial and error55515
Finding products that fit my hair, climate and lifestyle54413
Trusting ingredients are safe43411
Finding a stylist who knows textured hair43310
Buying products locally or abroad3328

Scored 1–5, retrospectively from research findings.

Every interview told the same story: “A lot of Googling, a lot of YouTube,” products bought and abandoned, and routines that broke when life or climate changed (“In Bali, I wash every day”). Product fit scored second, but recommending products to someone who doesn’t understand her hair only restarts the cycle, so understanding came first.

6. Prioritized solution

We chose photo analysis with a plain-language hair report, fed by a short lifestyle questionnaire.

Proposed solutionEase (5 = easy)Eng. effort (5 = easy)EffectivenessTotal
Photo analysis + plain-language hair report44513
Lifestyle questionnaire, by voice or text44412
Product recommendations from the profile44311
Routine builder with reminders32510
Stylist profiles and salon recommendations2237
AI hairstyle recommendation2226

Effort mapped from my feature backlog’s sizing (S = 4, M = 3, L = 2); scored retrospectively.

The analysis answers the top pain directly and was small to build on an existing multimodal model. The questionnaire and recommendations came with it, because a routine that ignores real life fails.

The call that changed the MVP: routines moved up. The routine builder was P2 and the largest feature, but a scan alone is a one-time novelty. Routines give people a reason to come back, rescan their hair at different moments and see it improve, which builds trust and makes the app worth keeping. I promoted routines and reminders into the MVP and made them the flow I tested.

Key product decisions

DecisionI choseOverWhy
Core experienceA guided flowA search bar or feedWin on clarity, not on volume of content
Understanding the userPhoto analysis plus lifestyle questionsHair type aloneRoutines fail when they ignore real life
AI’s roleExplain the why in plain languageJust output a routineTrust comes before automation
FeedbackThumbs up or down on every resultNo feedback loopUsers get control; the model learns
The hard trade-off: good recommendations need a long lifestyle questionnaire, and long forms are where people drop off. I made the questionnaire part of the value, not a gate, showing how each answer shapes the routine.

What we cut, and why

CutMoved toReason
Stylist profiles and salon recommendationsP4Real need, but a marketplace is a separate product; it needs trust and supply first
AI hairstyle recommendationP4Styling isn’t the root pain; high effort
Photo inspiration wallP4Engagement feature with no link to understanding
Product scan for match analysisP3Valuable, but depends on a product database that doesn’t exist yet

7. Develop MVP

The MVP is one loop: photo → plain-language report → lifestyle questions → routine and matched products → reminders and rescans, with a thumbs up or down on every answer.

North star: routines followed for three or more weeks. An analysis is a one-time novelty; weeks of routine change hair and earn trust.

StageMetricSignal
TryPhoto uploadedVanity on its own
UnderstandReport read, questionnaire doneReal
CommitRoutine started, reminders onReal
HabitRoutine followed 3+ weeksNorth star

User stories and acceptance criteria

#User storyAcceptance criteria
1As a woman with textured hair, I want to take or upload a photo and get an analysis, so that I finally understand what my hair needs.Camera or gallery upload, with tips on the confirm screen. The report explains results in plain language. Thumbs up or down on every result.
2As a user, I want to describe my lifestyle by voice or text, so that advice fits my climate and routine.Voice or text input. The assistant asks follow-up questions and offers suggested replies.
3As a user, I want products matched to my profile, so that I stop paying for trial and error.Each recommendation shows why it fits my profile. Save or shop from the list. Sponsored items labeled.
4As a user, I want to turn my report into a routine and add it to my calendar, so that I actually stick to it.An intro screen sets expectations. The routine is generated from my answers. Add to calendar in one step, with a confirmation.
5As a returning user, I want reminders and rescans, so that I can see my hair change over time.Wash-day and treatment reminders. Rescan at any time from home.

The test plan’s bar: complete each task with no errors.

User flows

The task flow is the happy path; the user flow shows every branch after the first report. Select a flow to open it full size.

Task flow: hair analysis and learning
Stories 1 and 3: from home to an uploaded photo, LLM review, the report and a response.
User flow: hair analysis and learning, with branches
Stories 1–5: after the report, users rate it, add voice or text context, view products, view the analysis or build a routine and add it to the calendar.

8. Launch plan

Just Hair hasn’t launched; this is how it will go to market. An iOS version is in definition.

  • First market: high-spending professionals with textured hair in the U.S., starting with the research participants and a waitlist.
  • Promotion: natural-hair creators and communities on YouTube and social, where research showed women already go to learn.
  • AI approach: ground an existing model in a curated hair-care knowledge base instead of training one. It ships fast, stays grounded in vetted hair science and updates without retraining. Fine-tuning comes once real thumbs up and down signals exist.
PhaseWhat shipsGate to move on
BetaAnalysis, questionnaire, routines, recommendations, feedback signalsOver 60% of users rate results; analysis rated accurate over 95% of the time
v2Product scan anywhere, progress tracking, household profiles, fine-tuned modelRoutines followed 3+ weeks
v3Stylist marketplace, climate and travel adjustmentsRecommendation revenue proven
Rollback. If accuracy signals drop below the gate, product recommendations switch off and the report falls back to education only, until the knowledge base is fixed.

How it will make money

PathHow it paysWhy it fits
Product recommendationsAffiliate revenue or brand partnersUsers already spend; these are purchase-intent moments
Premium routinesSubscription for tracking and household profilesValue grows the longer someone uses it
Stylist marketplaceBooking fee for vetted stylistsSolves the trust problem research surfaced

The risk to manage: affiliate money can bias recommendations, so they will stay tied to the hair profile, with sponsorship labeled.

Privacy, built in from day one

  • Explicit consent before any data improves the AI
  • Entries anonymized: names, location and photo metadata stripped
  • A clear “don’t train on my data” option
  • A plain-English explanation of how data helps the user

9. Customer feedback and iterations

Two rounds of testing shaped the final design. First a mid-fi test with the six research participants across three flows: complete a hair analysis, create a routine and find products.

What we sawWhat I changed
The “swipe no” button made people hesitateClarified the choice
Suggested replies sped people through the analysisKept and expanded them
The back arrow and back button confused peopleReplaced with a Cancel button
The photo-upload check lacked contextAdded a title, tips and guidance
People wanted more guidanceAdded an intro before the routine questions and a congratulations step that leads to add-to-calendar

Then an unmoderated Maze test of the routine flow, with no help: 17 people started and 7 finished.

ResultScore
Completed the routine flow85%
Said the hair report was what they needed86%
Rated its value to them 4 out of 557%
Found navigation “somewhat intuitive”57%

Testers liked the routine questions and the clean layout but found the light-blue buttons looked disabled and the background too busy. The nine changes that followed: a stronger call-to-action color, outlines instead of background scribbles, more photos, guide text, simpler copy for all levels of English, a stronger blur behind pop-ups, clearer checkboxes and better contrast.

Appendix: the full feature backlog

All 14 features, ranked P1 to P4 with effort sizes.

PriorityFeatureEffortOutcome
P1Log in and sign upSIn prototype
P1Photo or video upload and AI analysisSIn prototype
P1Product recommendationsSIn prototype
P1AI lifestyle questionnaire by voiceSIn prototype
P1Thumbs up or down signals on resultsSIn prototype
P2Photo uploads and profileSIn prototype
P2Routine creatorLIn prototype (promoted)
P2Scheduler and remindersMIn prototype
P3Product scan for match analysisMDeferred
P3Data-sharing settingsSPlanned for launch
P4Stylist profilesLCut
P4Salon recommendationsLCut
P4AI hairstyle recommendationLCut
P4Photo inspiration wallXSCut
← 🎓 C.O.T Next: 🔧 GoTukang →